4 principles by Paul Rand that may surprise you

Saul Bass, Milton Glaser and Paul Rand are something like the holy trinity of 20th century logo design. Between them, they branded a staggering number of the world’s biggest companies, from AT&T to IBM.

Rand, the eldest of the three, was arguably the most influential. His principles continue to inspire today. Some of them may surprise you.

Rand’s pro bono covers for Direction magazine. Left: March 1939; middle: April 1940; right: December 1940 (via Paul Rand)

Like Bass and Glaser, Rand was born to Jewish immigrants in New York City between the World Wars. He was artistically inclined and studied design at three different institutions, though he never cared much for them and always considered himself self-taught.

Soon he was earning praise for his magazine covers which he designed for free. Then, onward to logo.

Three of Rand’s earliest logos. Left: Esquire magazine, 1938; middle: Wallace Puppets, 1938; right: Coronet Brandy, 1941 (via Paul Rand)

A formative moment arrived when Rand met one of his idols, Hungarian Bauhaus artist László Moholy-Nagy. At their meeting, Moholy-Nagy asked if Rand read art criticism. When Rand said “no,” Moholy-Nagy reportedly replied “Pity.” From that point onward, Rand began reading art criticism and philosophy as much as he could.

After catching up on his art theory, Rand began to philosophize about his own work — what logos are, what they are not, what they are capable of being. We’ve summed up some of his biggest ideas into four major principles.

1. “A logo derives meaning from the quality of the thing it symbolizes, not the other way around.”

Left: Logo for IBM, 1956; right: 8-bar version 1972 (via Paul Rand)

Designers sometimes talk about logos as if they were responsible for conveying meaning by themselves and, hence, the success or failure of a logo is a factor of the design.

Rand never assigned such importance or responsibility to a logo:

It is only by association with a product, a service, a business, or a corporation that a logo takes on any real meaning. If a company is second rate, the logo will eventually be perceived as second rate. It is foolhardy to believe that a logo will do its job immediately, before an audience has been properly conditioned.”

This doesn’t mean that logos are insignificant — it means logos are free. They bear the burden only of marking, not meaning. This brings us to the second principle.

2. “The only mandate in logo design is that they be distinctive, memorable and clear.”

Logo for Westinghouse, 1960

In other words, logos can look like whatever they want. They don’t have to directly depict anything about the company they represent. In fact, sometimes it’s better when they don’t!

As Rand puts it:

“Surprising to many, the subject matter of a logo is of relatively little importance, and even appropriateness of content does not always play a significant role.

“This does not imply that appropriateness is undesirable. It merely indicates that a one-to-one relationship between a symbol and what it symbolized is very often impossible to achieve and, under certain conditions, objectionable. Ultimately, the only mandate in the design of logos, it seems, is that they be distinctive, memorable, and clear.”

3. Presentation is key

Logo for ABC 1962

Rand placed great importance on the act of presenting a design to a client. For each design, a designer must tell a unique story that is tailored to the client.

“How to present a new idea is, perhaps, one of the designer’s most difficult tasks. Everything a designer does involves presentation of some kind–not only how to explain (present) a particular design to an interested listener (client, reader, spectator), but how the design may explain itself in the marketplace…”

4. “Simplicity is not the goal. It is the by-product of a good idea and modest expectations.”

If you truly understand what a logo is and is not capable of doing, then your designs will always have the simplicity that we all celebrate.

The following examples illustrate Rand’s success in this regard:

Rebus poster for IBM, 1970

Logo for Yale University Press, 1985

Logo for Steve Jobs’ Next Computers, 1986

Logo re-design for Ford, 1966. It was not used.

Logo for UPS, 1961

Logo for Borzoi Books, 1945

Logo for Enron, 1996

Of the “holy trinity of logo design” (Rand, Bass, Glaser), who is your favorite?

Related articles

Skeuomorphism vs. flat design vs material design
/ /

Skeuomorphism vs. flat design vs material design

It’s design vocabulary time! We know you’ve heard these two terms floating around: skeuomorphism and flat design. What do they mean? They’re two contemporary designs trends that each have their own unique style and set of traits. Skeuomorphism creates a sense of familiarity by emulating materials, while flat design stays true to its medium, often feeling minimal and utilitarian. These…

31 horror movie posters so good it’s scary

31 horror movie posters so good it’s scary

Horror movies have been around for about 120 years. Things have changed since Georges Méliès’s The Haunted Castle (although maybe not that much), not just with the movies themselves, but with the way they’re advertised, too. Movie posters (usually featuring what’s known as “key art,” the singular image that is the foundation for a movie’s…

Digital design collections are museums’ latest trend
/ /

Digital design collections are museums’ latest trend

Museums have collected design objects for ages. The V&A in London was founded in 1852; the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) established its design department 80 years after that. For a long time they chugged along, building collections of furniture and tableware, posters and other works of graphic design on paper, consumer goods and the like. But the advent…

Current Design Contests

Designers, check out these contests so you can start building your career.